<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon CEO Fujio Mitarai on SED TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-ceo-fujio-mitarai-on-sed-tv.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-ceo-fujio-mitarai-on-sed-tv.html</link>
	<description>The Source for SED TV Reviews and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tk421</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-ceo-fujio-mitarai-on-sed-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>tk421</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 02:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-ceo-fujio-mitarai-on-sed-tv.html#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>The idea that Nano wanted to void the contract with canon for the simple reason that the latter had struck an agreemnet with Toshiba is ludicrous.  It&#039;s pretty obvious that they were looking for an excuse to renegotiate the contract with Canon, possibly with pressure from a competitor such as Samsung, who have shown interest in SED.
A Canon-Toshiba duo would be unbeatable on teh market.  Canon alone?  Would people trust a newcommer in the HDTV business?  The Toshiba branding would surely help.
If SED is really out in Japan by the end of the year, it might be reason to celebrate.  But how expensive will it be?  Remember how the Qualia line flopped?  Somehow I doubt the average consumer would see the difference in picture quality.  We here are a little different.  Hopefully I will be proven wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that Nano wanted to void the contract with canon for the simple reason that the latter had struck an agreemnet with Toshiba is ludicrous.  It&#8217;s pretty obvious that they were looking for an excuse to renegotiate the contract with Canon, possibly with pressure from a competitor such as Samsung, who have shown interest in SED.<br />
A Canon-Toshiba duo would be unbeatable on teh market.  Canon alone?  Would people trust a newcommer in the HDTV business?  The Toshiba branding would surely help.<br />
If SED is really out in Japan by the end of the year, it might be reason to celebrate.  But how expensive will it be?  Remember how the Qualia line flopped?  Somehow I doubt the average consumer would see the difference in picture quality.  We here are a little different.  Hopefully I will be proven wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

