<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon SED TV patent reissued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html</link>
	<description>The Source for SED TV Reviews and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veli-Pekka Nousiainen</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-53906</link>
		<dc:creator>Veli-Pekka Nousiainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-53906</guid>
		<description>which technologies do support 3D = stereoscopic displays without glasses? I put my (stock and buying) money on those technologies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which technologies do support 3D = stereoscopic displays without glasses? I put my (stock and buying) money on those technologies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auditor55</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-23712</link>
		<dc:creator>Auditor55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 18:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-23712</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nicholas,

For you most informative post regarding the differences between Plasma and SED.

I&#039;m glad that Canon is moving forward with SED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nicholas,</p>
<p>For you most informative post regarding the differences between Plasma and SED.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that Canon is moving forward with SED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gkdiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-23156</link>
		<dc:creator>gkdiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-23156</guid>
		<description>Andy,

You can find find information about the future of Pioneer Plasma displays at the Audio Asylum Forums:

http://www.audioasylum.com/index.htm

and the AVS Forums:

http://www.avsforum.com/

There is an interview with Paul Meyhoefer (Pioneer VP) in the current (June 2008) issue of Home Theater Magazine on page 17 in which he states, &quot;There is a combination of three critical parts that make up KURO technology: panel driving, video-processing circuitry, and filter technology, which all go beyond the attributes of the panel itself. Pioneer is only seeking partnership to manufacture the panel module itself. The panels will then be finished in Pioneer&#039;s assembly and finishing plants where many of the critical components are added.

On another note, as far as Plasma Vs. SED technology, we had a discussion on this site almost a year ago (June 2007). Other than the fact that they both use Phosphors they are VERY different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>You can find find information about the future of Pioneer Plasma displays at the Audio Asylum Forums:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.audioasylum.com/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.audioasylum.com/index.htm</a></p>
<p>and the AVS Forums:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.avsforum.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.avsforum.com/</a></p>
<p>There is an interview with Paul Meyhoefer (Pioneer VP) in the current (June 2008) issue of Home Theater Magazine on page 17 in which he states, &#8220;There is a combination of three critical parts that make up KURO technology: panel driving, video-processing circuitry, and filter technology, which all go beyond the attributes of the panel itself. Pioneer is only seeking partnership to manufacture the panel module itself. The panels will then be finished in Pioneer&#8217;s assembly and finishing plants where many of the critical components are added.</p>
<p>On another note, as far as Plasma Vs. SED technology, we had a discussion on this site almost a year ago (June 2007). Other than the fact that they both use Phosphors they are VERY different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-21530</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 06:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-21530</guid>
		<description>Nicolas that explanation is correct, just
needed the additional power usage explanation
to top it off, there it is Andy given to you
by Nicolas with out you having to lift a finger and expend a little energy and find out yourself, by the way andy do you know what
types of OLED there are? don&#039;t help him Nicolas, let him find out himself,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicolas that explanation is correct, just<br />
needed the additional power usage explanation<br />
to top it off, there it is Andy given to you<br />
by Nicolas with out you having to lift a finger and expend a little energy and find out yourself, by the way andy do you know what<br />
types of OLED there are? don&#8217;t help him Nicolas, let him find out himself,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-20235</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-20235</guid>
		<description>&gt; Plasma is basically a more expensive 
&gt; version of SED.

No, it really isn&#039;t. In plasma screens the phosphors are excited by ultra-violet light emitted by an electrical discharge passing through ionised gas - think of each sub-pixel as being like a tiny flurorescent tube. With SED the phosphors are excited by multiple electron beams, one per sub-pixel.

There are two very important differences. The less significant one is that it is impossible to switch a plasma pixel completely off; there is always some current leakage, which makes the pixel still glow a little even when it is supposed to be perfectly black. SED will have far darker blacks. 

The much more important difference is that plasma pixels have only two states: full on, and full off, with nothing in between. In order to simulate a pixel having variable brightness the pixel is actually flashed on and off multiple times during each frame. A &quot;bright&quot; pixel is switched on most of the time, while a darker one is on for a smaller fraction of the frame.

Operating like this creates various motion artefacts on plasma, and the possibility of rainbows (not to the extent that you see them on single-chip DLP, but still quite visible). But with SED you can actually vary the brightness of the pixel directly rather than having to emulate it by turning it on and off quickly.

Potentially you can also have a scanned image on SED - the picture being flashed up and then immediately fading to black between frames. This also makes for a much smoother perception of motion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Plasma is basically a more expensive<br />
&gt; version of SED.</p>
<p>No, it really isn&#8217;t. In plasma screens the phosphors are excited by ultra-violet light emitted by an electrical discharge passing through ionised gas &#8211; think of each sub-pixel as being like a tiny flurorescent tube. With SED the phosphors are excited by multiple electron beams, one per sub-pixel.</p>
<p>There are two very important differences. The less significant one is that it is impossible to switch a plasma pixel completely off; there is always some current leakage, which makes the pixel still glow a little even when it is supposed to be perfectly black. SED will have far darker blacks. </p>
<p>The much more important difference is that plasma pixels have only two states: full on, and full off, with nothing in between. In order to simulate a pixel having variable brightness the pixel is actually flashed on and off multiple times during each frame. A &#8220;bright&#8221; pixel is switched on most of the time, while a darker one is on for a smaller fraction of the frame.</p>
<p>Operating like this creates various motion artefacts on plasma, and the possibility of rainbows (not to the extent that you see them on single-chip DLP, but still quite visible). But with SED you can actually vary the brightness of the pixel directly rather than having to emulate it by turning it on and off quickly.</p>
<p>Potentially you can also have a scanned image on SED &#8211; the picture being flashed up and then immediately fading to black between frames. This also makes for a much smoother perception of motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-20137</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-20137</guid>
		<description>well Andy, based on your reply to my SED / PLASMA
differences, it was done that way, so as to be not too technical for the average jo blow, would
you understand the word PLASMA and its creation?
and would CRT and its function be also widely
understood by most consumers? I don&#039;t think so,
if a PLASMA PANEL and a SED PANEL both functioned the same way, then SED would be called a PLASMA PANEL Andy, the earlier PLASMA 
PANELS functioned exactly the same way the current ones do Andy, the latest ones have a 
refinement in their structure, more efficient, darker filters, smaller ribs, but they STILL
OPERATE the same way, 
as I said EARLIER Andy do some RESEARCH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well Andy, based on your reply to my SED / PLASMA<br />
differences, it was done that way, so as to be not too technical for the average jo blow, would<br />
you understand the word PLASMA and its creation?<br />
and would CRT and its function be also widely<br />
understood by most consumers? I don&#8217;t think so,<br />
if a PLASMA PANEL and a SED PANEL both functioned the same way, then SED would be called a PLASMA PANEL Andy, the earlier PLASMA<br />
PANELS functioned exactly the same way the current ones do Andy, the latest ones have a<br />
refinement in their structure, more efficient, darker filters, smaller ribs, but they STILL<br />
OPERATE the same way,<br />
as I said EARLIER Andy do some RESEARCH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-19277</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-19277</guid>
		<description>gkdaimond; Could you provide a link to the article stating Pioneer will continue releasing Plasma?  Everything I read indicates they are done.  Just today the following news was announced:

Pioneer and Matsushita (Panasonic) have finally hammered out the basics of a deal that will allow the latter to supply panels for future Kuro plasma displays, and plasma HDTV fans to breathe easy again. Pending a final agreement in May, dollars and cents remain undisclosed, but we can expect a fusion of Panasonic&#039;s current &quot;Neo PDP&quot; technology from its Viera line when they begin production May 2009 in Amagasaki before hitting shelves in the fall. Kuro will still be maintained as a premium brand (with a premium price) with different image processing, while both companies plan to keep working together on reducing power consumption and the infinite black level plasma. Pioneer still plans future Kuro LCD HDTVs based on panels from Sharp,but it&#039;ll also apparently have access to IPS technology from Panasonic&#039;s tie-up with Canon and Hitachi. See? We told you it&#039;d be okay.

Source: http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/KURO

It is (was?) believed that Panasonic will/would be selling the sets and purchasing the electronics and rights to call it &quot;Kuro&quot; from Pioneer.

Do you have a link to anymore more definitive?

http://www.dvhardware.net/article25697.html

As we predicted several years ago, plasma technology is on its way out. Putting one of the nails in the lengthy coffin is Pioneer Corp, who is stopping ALL production of plasma display panels. Last week we reported that they had decided to stop all 42-inch panel production, however that has now been expanded to its entire plasma line. This comes via an industry source briefed on the plan and quoted by Reuters in an article released today. Rather than panic, Pioneer shares immediately jumped to a four-month high following the report - up 11.2 percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gkdaimond; Could you provide a link to the article stating Pioneer will continue releasing Plasma?  Everything I read indicates they are done.  Just today the following news was announced:</p>
<p>Pioneer and Matsushita (Panasonic) have finally hammered out the basics of a deal that will allow the latter to supply panels for future Kuro plasma displays, and plasma HDTV fans to breathe easy again. Pending a final agreement in May, dollars and cents remain undisclosed, but we can expect a fusion of Panasonic&#8217;s current &#8220;Neo PDP&#8221; technology from its Viera line when they begin production May 2009 in Amagasaki before hitting shelves in the fall. Kuro will still be maintained as a premium brand (with a premium price) with different image processing, while both companies plan to keep working together on reducing power consumption and the infinite black level plasma. Pioneer still plans future Kuro LCD HDTVs based on panels from Sharp,but it&#8217;ll also apparently have access to IPS technology from Panasonic&#8217;s tie-up with Canon and Hitachi. See? We told you it&#8217;d be okay.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/KURO" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadgethd.com/tag/KURO</a></p>
<p>It is (was?) believed that Panasonic will/would be selling the sets and purchasing the electronics and rights to call it &#8220;Kuro&#8221; from Pioneer.</p>
<p>Do you have a link to anymore more definitive?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dvhardware.net/article25697.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dvhardware.net/article25697.html</a></p>
<p>As we predicted several years ago, plasma technology is on its way out. Putting one of the nails in the lengthy coffin is Pioneer Corp, who is stopping ALL production of plasma display panels. Last week we reported that they had decided to stop all 42-inch panel production, however that has now been expanded to its entire plasma line. This comes via an industry source briefed on the plan and quoted by Reuters in an article released today. Rather than panic, Pioneer shares immediately jumped to a four-month high following the report &#8211; up 11.2 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-19273</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-19273</guid>
		<description>Rocky, while your at it, why don&#039;t you add that Plasma &quot;now&quot;, and Plasma &quot;then&quot; also have nothing in common at all, as that is about how obsurd your comment is about the differences you have stated.

*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rocky, while your at it, why don&#8217;t you add that Plasma &#8220;now&#8221;, and Plasma &#8220;then&#8221; also have nothing in common at all, as that is about how obsurd your comment is about the differences you have stated.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SED TV Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-18717</link>
		<dc:creator>SED TV Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-18717</guid>
		<description>Hi Mikael and everyone else,

Thanks for reminding me that I&#039;m supposed to be running this site. I&#039;ve neglected it for a while. Sorry. I&#039;ll try to keep things going here despite the current lack of real news. If anyone is interested in writing on SED TV news or the technology itself, please feel free to contact me at allenj62@gmail.com. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mikael and everyone else,</p>
<p>Thanks for reminding me that I&#8217;m supposed to be running this site. I&#8217;ve neglected it for a while. Sorry. I&#8217;ll try to keep things going here despite the current lack of real news. If anyone is interested in writing on SED TV news or the technology itself, please feel free to contact me at <a href="mailto:allenj62@gmail.com">allenj62@gmail.com</a>. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html/comment-page-1#comment-17897</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/canon-sed-tv-patent-reissued.html#comment-17897</guid>
		<description>We have gained size and resolution at the cost of just everyting else. I just bought an LCD-tv for my parents. What a piece of shit... And no, it was certainly not the cheapest I could find.

Plasmas are okay, but thereÂ´s still too much problems with them for me to accept them as a real successor.

10-15 years ago, no one talked about brightness, contrast ratio and viewing angle.


Btw, who is running this site? It has been quiet here lately. HereÂ´s some news. http://www.japancorp.net/Article.Asp?Art_ID=17308
A bit old now, but new here :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have gained size and resolution at the cost of just everyting else. I just bought an LCD-tv for my parents. What a piece of shit&#8230; And no, it was certainly not the cheapest I could find.</p>
<p>Plasmas are okay, but thereÂ´s still too much problems with them for me to accept them as a real successor.</p>
<p>10-15 years ago, no one talked about brightness, contrast ratio and viewing angle.</p>
<p>Btw, who is running this site? It has been quiet here lately. HereÂ´s some news. <a href="http://www.japancorp.net/Article.Asp?Art_ID=17308" rel="nofollow">http://www.japancorp.net/Article.Asp?Art_ID=17308</a><br />
A bit old now, but new here <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

