<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SED TV Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com</link>
	<description>The Source for SED TV Reviews and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toshiba OLED TV follows the path of Toshiba SED TV by Schedule</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/tohiba-oled-tv-follows-the-path-of-toshiba-sed-tv.html/comment-page-1#comment-84480</link>
		<dc:creator>Schedule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/tohiba-oled-tv-follows-the-path-of-toshiba-sed-tv.html#comment-84480</guid>
		<description>Best you should make changes to the post name SED TV Reviews &#187; Toshiba OLED TV follows the path of Toshiba SED TV to something more catching for your content you make. I liked the post even sononetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best you should make changes to the post name SED TV Reviews &raquo; Toshiba OLED TV follows the path of Toshiba SED TV to something more catching for your content you make. I liked the post even sononetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by BIBO</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-80799</link>
		<dc:creator>BIBO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-80799</guid>
		<description>ALL THE WORLD SEE YES FOR SED TV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL THE WORLD SEE YES FOR SED TV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony/FET FED TV bites the dust by Schulp</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sonyfet-fed-tv-bites-the-dust.html/comment-page-1#comment-79407</link>
		<dc:creator>Schulp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=114#comment-79407</guid>
		<description>Too bad Canon gave up too now. (http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/05/25/canon.says.sed.too.expensive.for.home/)

Now what????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Canon gave up too now. (<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/05/25/canon.says.sed.too.expensive.for.home/" rel="nofollow">http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/05/25/canon.says.sed.too.expensive.for.home/</a>)</p>
<p>Now what????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by Rafales</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-77521</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-77521</guid>
		<description>Frustated to see the end of SED TV like this. 

I hope in future this technology will be used to bring back SED TV in some other name. We shall wait till then and I know its going to be a long wait if it happens.

Regards
Rafales</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frustated to see the end of SED TV like this. </p>
<p>I hope in future this technology will be used to bring back SED TV in some other name. We shall wait till then and I know its going to be a long wait if it happens.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Rafales</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-76430</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-76430</guid>
		<description>SED looked nice, but...100 thousand to 1 contrast?! As far as I understand, an old CRT has 1 million to one contrast. That new AMOLED LG TV has 10 million to one contrast.

I mean, SED sounded nice in theory. It also sounded like really, really low power. Maybe even less than FED? I have no idea.
But what do I want? Uh, sharpness, wonderful definition, a lot of contrast, vivid colors, huge lifetime, low power consumption and thin displays.
In that case, it seems that SED was a more modern-looking, slimmer and power-friendlier CRT. Not a better one.

Is OLED going to let me down? Maybe, since it has blue-color trouble and low lifetimes for the blue layer. But they say AMOLED goes a long way to fix the blue issue.

Still, FED does everything that CRT did, with less power. The problem is that it needs a higher vacuum, which it damages by itself because it releases gas when the electron rays hit the luminescent layer. Folks should hook up a vacuum pump to that tube and ship it integrated in the TV / computer display itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SED looked nice, but&#8230;100 thousand to 1 contrast?! As far as I understand, an old CRT has 1 million to one contrast. That new AMOLED LG TV has 10 million to one contrast.</p>
<p>I mean, SED sounded nice in theory. It also sounded like really, really low power. Maybe even less than FED? I have no idea.<br />
But what do I want? Uh, sharpness, wonderful definition, a lot of contrast, vivid colors, huge lifetime, low power consumption and thin displays.<br />
In that case, it seems that SED was a more modern-looking, slimmer and power-friendlier CRT. Not a better one.</p>
<p>Is OLED going to let me down? Maybe, since it has blue-color trouble and low lifetimes for the blue layer. But they say AMOLED goes a long way to fix the blue issue.</p>
<p>Still, FED does everything that CRT did, with less power. The problem is that it needs a higher vacuum, which it damages by itself because it releases gas when the electron rays hit the luminescent layer. Folks should hook up a vacuum pump to that tube and ship it integrated in the TV / computer display itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by 2100</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-75904</link>
		<dc:creator>2100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-75904</guid>
		<description>DON&#039;T LIE AND SAY THE TRUTH SED TV IS BEST technology  :-)  ;-)  8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T LIE AND SAY THE TRUTH SED TV IS BEST technology  <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by 2100</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-75903</link>
		<dc:creator>2100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-75903</guid>
		<description>sed vs fed in 3D 8)  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sed vs fed in 3D <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-75812</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-75812</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s cool.  Not upset.  I just figured life got in the way because I doubt these sites are what pay your mortgage.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s cool.  Not upset.  I just figured life got in the way because I doubt these sites are what pay your mortgage.  <img src='http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by SED TV Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-75750</link>
		<dc:creator>SED TV Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-75750</guid>
		<description>Sorry Eric, I must not have comment notification turned on there. Stand by...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Eric, I must not have comment notification turned on there. Stand by&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SED TV development halted by Canon. by Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/sed-tv-development-halted-by-canon.html/comment-page-1#comment-75588</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/?p=135#comment-75588</guid>
		<description>I tried to leave a comment on the FED TV reviews page but it&#039;s still waiting to be moderated.  That was over a month ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to leave a comment on the FED TV reviews page but it&#8217;s still waiting to be moderated.  That was over a month ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

