<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matsushita, Hitachi to triple LCD output to fend off SED TV competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/matsushita-hitachi-to-triple-lcd-output-to-fend-off-sed-tv-competition.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/matsushita-hitachi-to-triple-lcd-output-to-fend-off-sed-tv-competition.html</link>
	<description>The Source for SED TV Reviews and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan catmull</title>
		<link>http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/matsushita-hitachi-to-triple-lcd-output-to-fend-off-sed-tv-competition.html/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan catmull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sed-tv-reviews.com/matsushita-hitachi-to-triple-lcd-output-to-fend-off-sed-tv-competition.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>This is a typical response from companies STUCK with (investment wise)
inferior technology, it does not matter how low they price their product,
if its performance is lacking compared to SED, then people will not buy it,
most people who are bying BIG screen television, over 100cm size, will be
paying big money, and will expect the receiver to last them at least 10 years,
go and do a comparison between the same size PLASMA and LCD, the first
thing you will notice is the poor contrast of the LCD compared to the PLASMA,
the second thing will be the lack of clarity of the LCD compared to the PLASMA on moving objects,  and PLASMA is sadly lacking in contrast to SED,
these companies  investing in increasing production of LCD. are pouring 
their money down the drain, thats their bad luck,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a typical response from companies STUCK with (investment wise)<br />
inferior technology, it does not matter how low they price their product,<br />
if its performance is lacking compared to SED, then people will not buy it,<br />
most people who are bying BIG screen television, over 100cm size, will be<br />
paying big money, and will expect the receiver to last them at least 10 years,<br />
go and do a comparison between the same size PLASMA and LCD, the first<br />
thing you will notice is the poor contrast of the LCD compared to the PLASMA,<br />
the second thing will be the lack of clarity of the LCD compared to the PLASMA on moving objects,  and PLASMA is sadly lacking in contrast to SED,<br />
these companies  investing in increasing production of LCD. are pouring<br />
their money down the drain, thats their bad luck,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

